Mobility & Infrastructure Panorama

Mobility & Infrastructure Panorama

A clear view of how cities and countries compare on carsharing, EV charging, and MaaS maturity — standardized, explainable, and confidence-scored.

A clear view of how cities and countries compare on carsharing, EV charging, and MaaS maturity — standardized, explainable, and confidence-scored.

Why this matters

Why this matters

Cities and countries pour billions into sustainable mobility, but the data is scattered. Public dashboards like EAFO, OpenChargeMap, or operator reports give partial views, while consulting studies are static snapshots. The result: it’s hard to compare two markets side-by-side or track progress over time.

This segment brings together web intelligence and curated APIs under one taxonomy. You get standardized indicators for carsharing and EV charging, operator rankings, and a MaaS maturity index with clear explanations. For consultants, foresight teams, or policymakers, it means moving from patchwork data to a comparable, explainable view of mobility ecosystems, at local, national, and global scale.

How Starzdata solves this

How Starzdata solves this

  • Normalize territories (city, region, country) into a consistent taxonomy.

  • Count active operators and rank the top three (≥300 vehicles for carsharing).

  • Track public EV charging networks, excluding private or closed systems.

  • Compute a MaaS maturity index (0–100) combining operator scale, ticketing, and digital integration.

  • Provide plain-language comments and a confidence score for every variable.

This segment is activated with a blend of trusted sources and your own inputs

AI reasoning

Web intelligence

What you get:

What you get:

  • Comparable datasets on EV and carsharing ecosystems across geographies.

  • Top-3 operator lists with fleets and charging points, standardized.

  • MaaS maturity index with clear explanatory comments.

  • Ready-to-use outputs in CSV, Sheets, JSON, or API for BI or CRM.

Sample data for this segment

#geo name(input)geo level(input)carsharing operators countcarsharing operators count confidencecarsharing top3 listev charging operatorsev charging operators confidenceev charging top3 listmaas maturity indexmaas maturity index confidencemaas maturity comment
1Berlincity590%[{"name":"ShareNow","url":"www.share-now.com","fle...1088%[{"name":"Allego","url":"www.allego.eu","charging_...6882%High integration; multiple ≥300-car operators and ...
2Madridcity487%[{"name":"Zity","url":"www.zity.eco","fleet_size":...986%[{"name":"Endesa X","url":"www.endesax.com","charg...6280%Mature ecosystem with strong operator presence; di...
3Warsawcity384%[{"name":"Panek Carsharing","url":"www.panekcs.pl"...783%[{"name":"GreenWay","url":"www.greenwaypolska.pl",...5478%Developing MaaS; large local operators but limited...
4Oslocity488%[{"name":"Hyre","url":"www.hyre.no","fleet_size":3...1290%[{"name":"Fortum Charge & Drive","url":"www.fortum...8085%Leading MaaS city; full integration, large EV flee...
5Californiastate686%[{"name":"Zipcar","url":"www.zipcar.com","fleet_si...1589%[{"name":"ChargePoint","url":"www.chargepoint.com"...7283%Diverse operators; MaaS maturity driven by EV adop...
6New York Statestate585%[{"name":"Zipcar","url":"www.zipcar.com","fleet_si...1184%[{"name":"ConEdison","url":"www.coned.com","chargi...6480%Moderate MaaS maturity; strong in NYC but uneven a...
7Francecountry887%[{"name":"Free2Move","url":"www.free2move.com","fl...2590%[{"name":"TotalEnergies","url":"www.totalenergies....7082%Balanced maturity; strong in Paris and Lyon, moder...
8Polandcountry482%[{"name":"Panek Carsharing","url":"www.panekcs.pl"...981%[{"name":"GreenWay","url":"www.greenwaypolska.pl",...5277%Emerging MaaS; fragmented operators, integration s...
9Netherlandscountry788%[{"name":"Greenwheels","url":"www.greenwheels.com"...2091%[{"name":"EVBox","url":"www.evbox.com","charging_p...7886%Strong national maturity; dense charging and MaaS-...
10Texasstate381%[{"name":"Zipcar","url":"www.zipcar.com","fleet_si...880%[{"name":"Tesla Supercharger","url":"www.tesla.com...4975%Low MaaS maturity; carsharing limited to a few met...
Showing 1 to 10 of 10 entries • Click row for details

Each row represents a city, region, or country. Inputs are the geography name and level. Outputs include the number of active carsharing and EV charging operators, the top three providers with fleets or charging points, and a MaaS maturity score from 0 to 100. A short comment explains the score. Every variable comes with a confidence score that reflects source quality, freshness, and methods.

... or explore the segment structure:
... or explore the segment structure:
... or explore the segment structure:
Your questions on this segment, answered

How quickly can we get a first extract for a new geography?

How quickly can we get a first extract for a new geography?

What confidence should I place in the maturity scores?

What confidence should I place in the maturity scores?

Can we integrate the outputs into BI, CRM, or policy tools?

Can we integrate the outputs into BI, CRM, or policy tools?

How does this dataset differ from EAFO, OpenChargeMap, or city dashboards?

How does this dataset differ from EAFO, OpenChargeMap, or city dashboards?

How do you ensure comparability across cities and countries?

How do you ensure comparability across cities and countries?

How are operator counts and top-3 rankings defined?

How are operator counts and top-3 rankings defined?

What exactly does the MaaS maturity index measure?

What exactly does the MaaS maturity index measure?

How often is the mobility dataset refreshed?

How often is the mobility dataset refreshed?