Legal Risk Signals

Legal Risk Signals

Spot disputes before they escalate — filings, press, and counterparties scored by severity and recency.

Spot disputes before they escalate — filings, press, and counterparties scored by severity and recency.

Why this matters

Why this matters

Litigation risk often surfaces before financial distress — from unpaid bills to regulatory disputes. Yet legal exposure is scattered across registries and press, making it invisible in CRM or supply chain workflows.

Consultants, SaaS vendors, and strategic foresight teams need a structured, explainable view of disputes to act early. This segment standardizes legal filings, enriches with litigation news, classifies case typologies, and scores exposure by severity, recency, and counterparties.

How Starzdata solves this

How Starzdata solves this

  • Normalize filings and case registries into structured variables.

  • Enrich with litigation press mentions and sentiment.

  • Score exposure by severity, recency, typology, and counterparty risk.


This segment is activated with a blend of trusted sources and your own inputs

AI reasoning

User Input

Curated APIs

Web intelligence

What you get:

What you get:

  • Legal filings: counts, dates, dispute types, counterparties.

  • Press signals: volume and sentiment of litigation coverage.

  • Exposure scoring: composite index combining severity, recency, and escalation risk.

  • Roll-ups: sector and country heatmaps to size and prioritize risk.

Sample data for this segment

#company namecompany name confidencewebsite domainwebsite domain confidencelocal country isolocal country iso confidencesector naicssector naics confidencelitigation case countlitigation case count confidencelatest case datelatest case date confidencecase typologycase typology confidencecounterparty typecounterparty type confidencecase severity indexcase severity index confidencepress mentions countpress mentions count confidencepress sentimentpress sentiment confidencelegal exposure scorelegal exposure score confidence
1EuroBuild Contractors GmbH100%eurobuild.de91%DE100%236220100%5100%2025-02-15100%Commercial dispute96%Supplier90%7294%1288%Negative85%8490%
2MedicaLife Italia S.p.A.100%medicalife.it92%IT100%339112100%2100%2024-11-22100%Employment dispute95%Employee92%4092%486%Neutral84%5587%
3Energia Verde SL100%energiaverde.es93%ES100%221114100%3100%2025-01-30100%Regulatory fine94%Government90%6593%987%Negative86%7788%
4Delta Port Logistics BV100%deltaport.nl94%NL100%488320100%1100%2023-09-18100%IP litigation93%Competitor89%5891%686%Neutral83%6386%
5InnoParts France SAS100%innoparts.fr92%FR100%336390100%7100%2025-02-05100%Commercial dispute96%Customer91%8194%1589%Negative86%9091%
Showing 1 to 5 of 5 entries • Click row for details

Each row represents one company with normalized litigation filings and press coverage. The dataset captures number of cases, latest filing dates, dispute typologies, counterparties, and severity. It also integrates press mentions and sentiment to provide context on visibility and reputational impact. All fields include confidence scores for transparency, making the dataset auditable and CRM/BI-ready.

Your questions on this segment, answered

How can consulting or foresight teams use this dataset?

How can consulting or foresight teams use this dataset?

How can consulting or foresight teams use this dataset?

How fresh and reliable is the litigation data?

How fresh and reliable is the litigation data?

How fresh and reliable is the litigation data?

Can this be used in supplier and M&A due diligence?

Can this be used in supplier and M&A due diligence?

Can this be used in supplier and M&A due diligence?

What’s the added value compared to raw court filings?

What’s the added value compared to raw court filings?

What’s the added value compared to raw court filings?

How is the legal exposure score calculated?

How is the legal exposure score calculated?

How is the legal exposure score calculated?

What kinds of disputes are included in this radar?

What kinds of disputes are included in this radar?

What kinds of disputes are included in this radar?

Why does litigation matter for risk management?

Why does litigation matter for risk management?

Why does litigation matter for risk management?

Your questions on this segment, answered

How can consulting or foresight teams use this dataset?

By quantifying litigation exposure at sector or country level, they can identify systemic risks, benchmark industries, and support foresight models with hard legal evidence.

How fresh and reliable is the litigation data?

Filings and press coverage are continuously updated. Each field carries a confidence score based on source quality and recency, making the dataset auditable.

Can this be used in supplier and M&A due diligence?

Yes. Early visibility on disputes helps assess counterparties and acquisition targets, mitigating reputational and financial risks before they escalate.

What’s the added value compared to raw court filings?

Instead of scattered filings, you get standardized variables, exposure scoring, and aggregated heatmaps by sector and country, ready to plug into BI or CRM workflows.

How is the legal exposure score calculated?

It combines the number of filings, severity, recency, and litigation press signals into a single 0–100 index.

What kinds of disputes are included in this radar?

We capture and classify commercial, employment, regulatory, and intellectual property disputes, mapped to counterparties such as suppliers, customers, employees, governments, or competitors.

Why does litigation matter for risk management?

Because disputes often surface before financial distress. They flag issues like unpaid invoices, regulatory fines, or commercial conflicts that can escalate months before balance sheets show trouble.

{ "_meta": { "dictionaryColumns": ["Variable", "Data_Type", "Sample_Value", "Description"] }, "data": [ { "Variable": "company_name", "Description": "Registered name of the company", "Business_Rules": "UTF-8 string, registry standard", "Source_System": "Open Data", "Data_Type": "VARCHAR", "Sample_Value": "EuroBuild Contractors GmbH" }, { "Variable": "website_domain", "Description": "Primary website domain for enrichment", "Business_Rules": "Valid domain string", "Source_System": "Web Intelligence", "Data_Type": "VARCHAR", "Sample_Value": "eurobuild.de" }, { "Variable": "litigation_case_count", "Description": "Number of legal cases filed against company", "Business_Rules": "Integer ≥ 0", "Source_System": "Open Data", "Data_Type": "INTEGER", "Sample_Value": "5" }, { "Variable": "case_typology", "Description": "Classification of litigation type", "Business_Rules": "ENUM: {Commercial dispute, Employment dispute, Regulatory fine, IP litigation}", "Source_System": "Web+AI Reasoning", "Data_Type": "ENUM", "Sample_Value": "Commercial dispute" }, { "Variable": "counterparty_type", "Description": "Type of counterparty in litigation", "Business_Rules": "ENUM: {Supplier, Customer, Employee, Government, Competitor}", "Source_System": "Web Intelligence", "Data_Type": "ENUM", "Sample_Value": "Supplier" }, { "Variable": "case_severity_index", "Description": "Normalized severity score of the case(s)", "Business_Rules": "0–100 index", "Source_System": "Web+AI Reasoning", "Data_Type": "INTEGER", "Sample_Value": "72" }, { "Variable": "press_mentions_count", "Description": "Number of litigation-related press mentions", "Business_Rules": "Integer ≥ 0", "Source_System": "Web Intelligence", "Data_Type": "INTEGER", "Sample_Value": "12" }, { "Variable": "press_sentiment", "Description": "Sentiment of litigation-related press", "Business_Rules": "ENUM: {Negative, Neutral, Positive}", "Source_System": "Web+AI Reasoning", "Data_Type": "ENUM", "Sample_Value": "Negative" }, { "Variable": "legal_exposure_score", "Description": "Composite exposure score (filings + press + severity)", "Business_Rules": "0–100 index", "Source_System": "Web+AI Reasoning", "Data_Type": "INTEGER", "Sample_Value": "84" } ] }