Corporate expansion hides behind complex webs of subsidiaries and local branches. Aggregated views obscure when and where groups are truly investing. For consultants and foresight teams, this means missing structural market entry signals. For GTM leaders, it blocks targeting of local decision-making entities.
By using registry-backed subsidiaries with opening dates, geographies, and parent context, Starzdata delivers a subsidiary-by-subsidiary expansion map. This makes corporate footprints traceable, explainable, and actionable across both strategy and GTM workflows.
Match parent company via corporate registries
Extract each verified subsidiary with opening dates and country
Enrich with group-level structural growth score for benchmarking
This segment is activated with a blend of trusted sources and your own inputs
User Input
Curated APIs
Web intelligence
Canonicalized parent company names with HQ country
Verified subsidiaries with country, opening date, and type
Total subsidiary counts by parent group
Structural Growth Score reflecting expansion pace and footprint
Standardized dataset, ready for CRM, BI, and market analysis
Your questions on this segment, answered
Your questions on this segment, answered
Can we roll up subsidiary expansion by sector and geography to spot hotspots of investment activity?
Absolutely. Subsidiary events can be aggregated at sector and geography level, surfacing investment hotspots and structural momentum in specific regions or verticals.
Are the subsidiary data points fully traceable back to official registries for compliance and audit purposes?
Yes. Each record carries a registry anchor and confidence score. This ensures every subsidiary entry is auditable and defensible, a critical requirement for compliance-sensitive teams.
How easily can this subsidiary-level view be integrated into CRM or BI systems for targeting and strategy alignment?
Outputs are delivered in standardized CSV/Parquet with dictionary mapping, ready to plug into CRM and BI pipelines. That means GTM and consulting teams can operationalize the signals without extra processing.
Can this dataset highlight early expansion patterns that may signal new market entry or competitive threats?
Yes. By sequencing subsidiary openings over time and geography, the dataset surfaces early entry patterns. This gives strategy teams a foresight view on where competitors or partners are building new footprints.
How can the Structural Growth Score help us compare expansion momentum between different groups or sectors?
The Structural Growth Score normalizes expansion activity across geography and time, letting you benchmark groups against peers in their sector. It highlights not just the number of subsidiaries, but the recency and breadth of expansion, which are more predictive of strategic intent.
How quickly after a subsidiary is created or registered can we detect and map it?
Subsidiary events are generally captured within weeks of official registration. Web intelligence signals and curated feeds shorten lag time, giving GTM teams earlier visibility on expansion moves.
How complete is the subsidiary coverage, especially in regions where registries are fragmented or less transparent?
Coverage is anchored in official corporate registries across Europe, North America, and Asia, complemented by curated enrichment. In markets where registries are weaker, confidence scoring makes gaps explicit so teams know where the data is solid and where to exercise caution.
{ "_meta": { "dictionaryColumns": ["Variable", "Data_Type", "Sample_Value", "Description"] }, "data": [ { "Variable": "parent_company_name_input", "Description": "Parent company name provided by client", "Business_Rules": "Mandatory; raw input for company matching", "Source_System": "User Inputs", "Data_Type": "VARCHAR", "Sample_Value": "MediNova AI" }, { "Variable": "parent_company_url_input", "Description": "Parent company website provided by client", "Business_Rules": "Mandatory; raw input for company matching", "Source_System": "User Inputs", "Data_Type": "VARCHAR", "Sample_Value": "https://www.medinova.ai" }, { "Variable": "parent_company_name", "Description": "Canonicalized name of the parent company", "Business_Rules": "Matched from Creditsafe", "Source_System": "Creditsafe", "Data_Type": "VARCHAR", "Sample_Value": "MediNova AI Ltd" }, { "Variable": "hq_country", "Description": "Primary HQ country of the parent company", "Business_Rules": "ISO alpha-2 code", "Source_System": "Creditsafe", "Data_Type": "VARCHAR", "Sample_Value": "UK" }, { "Variable": "subsidiary_name", "Description": "Verified legal name of the subsidiary", "Business_Rules": "Canonicalized from registry data", "Source_System": "Creditsafe", "Data_Type": "VARCHAR", "Sample_Value": "MediNova France SAS" }, { "Variable": "subsidiary_country", "Description": "Country of the subsidiary", "Business_Rules": "ISO alpha-2 code", "Source_System": "Creditsafe", "Data_Type": "VARCHAR", "Sample_Value": "FR" }, { "Variable": "subsidiary_opening_date", "Description": "Date the subsidiary or branch was established", "Business_Rules": "YYYY-MM-DD; null if not available", "Source_System": "Creditsafe", "Data_Type": "DATE", "Sample_Value": "2021-09-20" }, { "Variable": "subsidiary_type", "Description": "Subsidiary type classification", "Business_Rules": "ENUM: ['Subsidiary','Branch','Joint Venture','Other']", "Source_System": "Creditsafe", "Data_Type": "ENUM", "Sample_Value": "Subsidiary" }, { "Variable": "total_subsidiaries_count", "Description": "Total subsidiaries of the parent company", "Business_Rules": "Integer >= 0", "Source_System": "Creditsafe", "Data_Type": "INTEGER", "Sample_Value": 5 }, { "Variable": "structural_growth_score", "Description": "Composite score of group expansion momentum", "Business_Rules": "Range 0–100; weighted by recency and geographic spread", "Source_System": "Creditsafe", "Data_Type": "INTEGER", "Sample_Value": 78 } ] }
